Draft, Review, Approve — With Full Control.
RankerBase enforces a structured content pipeline. Every piece moves from draft to review to approval before it touches your CMS. Nothing publishes without a human decision.
The Problem
Without a structured pipeline, content goes from AI generation straight to publication — or sits in a shared drive and never gets reviewed. Quality is inconsistent. There's no audit trail. And when something bad goes live, nobody knows who approved it.
What This Does, Concretely
Multi-User Roles
Admin, editor, and viewer roles with distinct permissions. Admins configure workflows. Editors review and approve. Viewers can see status without editing. Every action is attributed.
Review Queues
Every generated draft enters a review queue. Reviewers see quality scores, brief compliance, and edit history. No content skips the human checkpoint.
Full Audit Trail
Every action — generation, edit, approval, rejection, publish — is logged with timestamps and user attribution. Know who did what and when.
Draft-First Publishing
When you approve content, it pushes to your CMS as a draft. Your team publishes on their own schedule. RankerBase never publishes content live without your explicit action.
Where This Fits in Your Workflow
Scored draft generated
Review → Edit → Approve
Push draft to CMS
What This Looks Like in Practice
Example: An editor on a 3-person content team reviews the week's drafts.
- 1Five drafts sit in the review queue, each with quality scores and the brief they were generated against.
- 2The editor opens the top-scored draft (87/100), makes minor headline edits, and approves it.
- 3A second draft scored 64/100 — flagged for weak topical coverage. The editor sends it back for regeneration with a note.
- 4Three approved drafts are pushed to WordPress as drafts. The editor schedules publication for Monday.
- 5All actions — edits, approvals, rejections, publishes — are logged in the audit trail.
Result: The team processed five drafts in one session with clear quality gates. Nothing went live without review, and the low-scoring draft was caught before it reached the CMS.
This is an example workflow, not a customer case study.
What Stays Under Your Control
Who can review, edit, and approve content
Quality score thresholds for the review queue
Whether drafts auto-queue or require manual selection
When approved drafts are pushed to your CMS
Publication timing in your CMS
Walk Through the Review Process
See the full draft-to-publish workflow — review queues, scoring, approval gates, and CMS publishing.